The Hypocrisy of Pornography

Originally Posted on www.huffingtonpost.co.uk

For a long time now I've been thinking about the porn debate that I constantly see in the news. Whenever the debate about the negative aspects of porn rears its ugly head the public is always told about the negative effects it can have on women, such as the way it can squash the reality of feminine beauty or portray women as objects designed for one thing. On the other hand we are also told about the negative effects it can have on straight men, such as a rewiring of the brain or contributing to psychological problems.

Anti-porn activist Gail Dines has even discussed how pornography tells a false story about men and women, which ultimately lies about what it means to be male and female.

Now everyone has their own stance on pornography and with access to the Internet and cable channels, whether we like it or not porn looks as though it is here to stay for quite some time.

The reason why it has crept back into the foreground of my mind is due to a little programme on BBC Three called Unsafe Sex in the City. The programme, which is a new take on the fly on the wall documentary series that we've all become accustomed to over the last decade or two, is based in a sexual health clinic in Manchester where we are able to hear and sometimes see what many people have been up to on a night out, and believe me sometimes it isn't pleasant.

During the second episode of the show two young gay men were featured, who as well as having vey active sex lives, worked as porn stars. This got me thinking about the hypocrisy of the porn industry, especially in the world of gay porn.

As the two young men were to feature in a bareback porn movie (bareback being the act of having sex without a condom), they were sent to have full sexual health screenings. Now as many will know porn stars have to be sent for sexual health tests regularly to ensure that a breakout of something doesn't occur, and the man shooting the film explained this during the programme.

However the main reason they appeared to be getting tested was due to the nature of the film they were to shoot, which is where we get into the hypocrisy of it all. As they were to be filming a porno movie where no protection was being used then surely this is the promotion of unsafe sex?

Since the outbreak of HIV during the 1980s the general public, especially the gay community, have been made aware that unprotected sex could lead to the contraction of the HIV virus. As gay men are seemingly at a higher risk, then surely shooting a film featuring two young and vulnerable looking gay men without protection can't be doing anyone any good.

I may be wrong but in the same way it is perceived that women may think they have to act and perform a certain way during sex because of porn, then surely the same principal can be applied to naïve or impressionable gay men, which in this case could prove dangerous. Along with this the constant normalising and sometimes glamorising of unprotected sex may also be undoing much of the good work by various charities; who are trying to get people to wrap it up and prevent the spreading of this virus.

But It looks as though whilst the porn industry is acting as though they care by sending their stars for check ups they are merely doing it to cover their own backs in case anything happens to one of their performers. But when it comes to the everyday person in the street who goes out on a weekend looking for a good time, it appears they don't actually care that much as they continue to turn out pornography such as this to the masses.

Would Queer as Folk Have Been Made Today?

Originally published on www.biggaypictureshow.com

In 1999 a Channel 4 series not only changed the landscape for homosexuality on television but television in general. Queer as Folk introduced viewing audiences to the lives of a group of gay men living in Manchester that regularly frequented the infamous Canal Street.

But after making such an impact on audiences the world over, and after all the series was re-made for an American audience (which ran for five seasons), it makes you wonder whether this type of programme would get commissioned now.

It’s been more than 10 years since we last saw Stuart, Vince, and Nathan and all the other characters popping up on our screens, but the impact they left is phenomenal. Before the show gay men had representation on television – after all Dale Winton and Julian Clary were extremely popular – but this was the first time a group of gay characters were central to an entire series, and not just a few extra characters added on at the end.

Since the show left the airwaves it paved the way for multiple gay characters and storylines in a whole variety of different shows. It isn’t unusual these days to turn on any soap opera and see several gay characters, something that wasn’t really seen before the turn of the new millennium, which was just after Queer as Folk. Gay men and women now had a significant part in soaps, dramas and comedy shows, allowing the public to see that gay people are everywhere and that we’re just normal people.

However, whereas we do get multiple gay characters frequenting the Rovers Return or the Queen Vic, gay specific shows seem to be very few and far between. There was Sugar Rush on Channel 4 that came around in 2004, and now we have Lip Service, which was first introduced in 2010, but that means that in the 11 years between Queer as Folk and Lip Service there was only one other UK television show that focused primarily on gay characters.

Maybe it’s because there just aren’t people out there writing these kinds of programmes now or maybe they feel that after Queer as Folk there wasn’t much more to be done – I mean who would want to take on the amazing Russell T Davies? But it could also have something to do with attitudes. In the last few years there have been multiple complaints made to Ofcom regarding gay people on screen in shows such as Coronation Street, Eastenders and Torchwood, but why is this? Surely attitudes have become more diverse in the last 10 years since Queer as Folk came out, or maybe due to the lack of gay central shows people are forgetting about the impact that was made a decade ago, or maybe it’s as simple as people were a little bit more open and curious back in the 90s.

It does appear that given the length of time between these gay central shows and the complaints received about soap operas, that if Queer as Folk were to be pitched today and not 10 years ago, then it wouldn’t have been made. Then again if it had never been made in the first place I doubt there would be many gay people in soaps today.

It’s not all doom and gloom though, just recently it was announced that comedian Sue Perkins will be staring in a comedy series for BBC2 called Heading Out, which will see Perkins play a vet who is afraid to come out to her parents.

So maybe we are about to turn a corner and see more LGBT focused programmes again where gay people play the leads, but whether something like Queer As Folk will come along again is a different matter all together.

Manchester Pride 2011: Diary

Originally posted on www.differentscene.co.uk

This weekend saw Manchester Pride celebrate its 21^st birthday, and like any other 21^st birthday bash it was big, colourful and filled with partying and joy. Manchester Pride truly was a celebration of everything gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered.

DS were lucky enough to get to experience the weekend in its whole and it was a very eventful weekend filled with amazing live acts from both the musical and comedy worlds, I even got groped by a lesbian in a chip shop, now that to me is a sign of a good weekend. So here is our Manchester Pride 2011 diary:

Friday

Friday night saw the pride festival kick off and Canal Street and the rest of the gay village went into full swing. By 7.30pm when I arrived at the village the streets were already buzzing with excited faces all looking to party the bank holiday weekend away at what was being called ‘gay Christmas’ by a huge number of attendees.

I set off to explore the situation on the streets of Pride where I was faced with huge crowds swiftly circulating through the streets and into the bars that were pumping with the latest top 40 chart hits and some brilliant musical cheese to get everyone in the mood, considering it was the first night the place was packed and I can remember thinking; if this is how it looks only a few hours into it kicking off, then it’s going to be one hell of a weekend.

After working my way through the bars and feeling like David Attenborough exploring the wilderness I made my way towards the main stage, like most other people to get ready for Friday’s headliner; Pam Ann!!!

Now let me tell you after witnessing a few television appearances by the lady herself I had myself braced for few laughs, but nothing could have prepared me for the side splitting comedy that she churned out line after line, and to be honest I don’t think the others members of the crowd were expecting the hilarity that was on offer.

Pam Ann truly had the audience in the palm of her hand, and for the majority of the show she had two of the audiences members on stage to help her with the act, which all began after a hilarious demonstration of how the Grindr app works, no doubt this was one of their pride highlights that they’ll remember for a long time. Couple this piece of comedy genius that played directly to the gay audience on hand, she also attempted to sign along with the signer on the side of the stage, which proved for some impromptu comedy moments that had the crowd almost rolling around the car park floor.

After the brilliant half hour set from the Australian comedienne I headed back to the bars to see how things were shaping up, and you couldn’t move for the life of you as every bar was filled to the brim with every type of person you could imagine. After a few quick drinks it was off to the train to prepare for the parade the next morning.

Saturday

It was a bright and early start for the Manchester Pride parade, which kicked off on the streets of Manchester at 1pm. Arriving in the city the sky was grey and it looked as though it may be a pretty miserable day for a parade to celebrate everything that pride stands for. But that didn’t stop the crowds as they gathered in their masses along the barricaded streets with their rainbow flags, hats and whistles in tow to help show their support.

As the parade kicked off the grey clouds soon cleared up and the sun came out to help shine a light over the whole parade extravaganza. The parade was made up of numerous floats big and small with a wide range of eccentric beings parading back and forth, I saw charities such as George House Trust and the Lesbian and Gay Foundation marching, then members of the three major political parties (Labour complete with ‘ never kissed a tory’ t-shirts) and then some of the more random members of the parade including a group of people doing silly walks, a group of female singers dancing to Dolly Parton’s ‘9 to 5’ as they sauntered past, a number of male models escorting the Selfridges van in nothing but very small Calvin Klein underwear that no doubt kept the majority of the crowds extremely happy, there was a few Lady Gaga impersonators strutting their stuff along the streets of Manchester and even the cast of Coronation Street hoped aboard a float to show their support, including the likes of Brooke Vincent and Antony Cotton, but then the last float really did rain on everyone else’s parade. The Co-Op came out in full force complete with a float belting out musical numbers and most likely every member of the Co-Op team from around the North West to push trolleys and show their support for Pride’s big 21^st birthday bash.

So after the parade finished around the 3pm mark, I once again ventured into the village to see what was going down. I discovered that at only 3pm the streets were a lot emptier than they had been the previous, probably due to most people using the morning to recover from the few too many they’d had the night before and preparing for another night of partying, but that said the streets still had a large crowd, especially for that time in the afternoon. So not wanting to fall into the realm of being horribly drunk and unaware of what was going on I decided to take a little trip around and see what stalls the village had to offer. On my little trip around the stalls I found some weird, wonderful and random stalls selling anything from original artwork, jewellery, rainbow flag patterned cat coats and some of the most disturbing sex toys one can imagine, needless to say I promptly left that last stall out of the fear of looking creepy and attracting the wrong attention.

Later on in the evening as my wandering was coming to an end I stumbled across a singer/songwriter called Lucy Spraggan in the village square, she apparently came second in a live and unsigned music competition so go give her a listen she’s pretty good. But yes after this surprise discovery at the back end of the village I manoeuvred my way towards the main stage once again to watch pop singer Pixie Lott. Might I say I was tremendously excited.

The crowd was absolutely heaving as they awaited the arrival of Miss Lott, you couldn’t move properly without fear of being burnt on the nearest cigarette and a trip to the toilet that was situated two seconds away from me took around 15 minutes, so as you can see the stage was pretty full. Sadly I couldn’t get close enough to the stage like I had the previous night, being small there was a slight possibility I may have been trampled, but all the same my view was still pretty good indeed.

As she arrived looking absolutely amazing, she took centre stage to prepare for an acoustic set of some of her biggest hits including ‘ Mama Do’ and ‘Cry Me Out’, she even belted out a brilliant cover of the song ‘Isn’t She Lovely’, and I must say she was. The only problem has to be she only managed to stay on stage for 20 minutes, which was very disappointing, but the 20 minutes she did stay for were brilliant. So after having my Pixie fix cut short I had plenty of time that I hadn’t scheduled in so it was back to experience the hustle and bustle of the bars that resembled sardine tins for gay men, so I resorted to a little dance in Sackville gardens to end the night.

Sunday

Sunday was a day for music as it contained the best line up so far, Patrick Wolf, Sugababes and Alexandra Burke all in one night. AMAZING!

I managed to rush my self to the front of the crowd soon after I arrived. See there are advantages of being small sometimes. Soon after arriving Patrick Wolf took to the stage to perform an hour long set of hits old and new that included ‘The magic Position’ and ‘Accident & Emergency’, it’s a shame Miss Lott couldn’t have done the same as Patrick, but we still love her. Luckily the rain held off for the majority of the gig as Wolf danced around the stage, interacted with the audience, he even lay on some of them at one point and snapped a photo I assume they’ll treasure for a long time, he even made a few joke about some of the crowd not being there for him but for the following acts as he sang the little lines he knew from a select few Sugababes and Alexandra Burke songs. He rounded of his magnificent and engaging set with a small clearly unprepared speech about pride that got the audience cheering away, followed by ‘The City’ from his latest album.

So with an hour and a half to fill until the Sugababes version four hit the stage I quickly ran off for a bite to eat, but to my shock and amazement on returning to the main stage they had once again reached full capacity so it was off to Sackville gardens to watch the Sugababes do their thing, what ever their thing may be now that they are on their fourth line-up.

The girls hit the stage to a sea of chants, especially for the lovely Heidi who’s clearly the Ken Barlow of the Sugababes. They performed an array of hits new and old with both Jade and Amelle filling in the vocals for the departed Keisha and Mutya. Hits like ‘Push the Button’, ‘Red Dress’ and ‘Freak Like Me’ really raised the crowd’s spirits higher than they already were, and their new single ‘Freedom’ also worked the crowd up a treat. It was fair to say the girls truly got everyone in a dancing mood ready for the lady with the X Factor, who was coming next.

With the main event herself coming up I managed to break my way through the seas of rainbow flags and warm alcopops to get a good side stage view of Alexandra, and I must say I was excited. As the sea of people produced a wave of screaming chants towards the stage, she emerged looking absolutely fabulous in a little black number and showed the crowd exactly why she won the X factor crown as she belted out her number one hits like ‘Hallelujah’ and ‘Start Without you’ and throwing in a few more chart hits like ‘Broken Heels’ for good measure. The crowd was absolutely lapping her up, and she has clearly broken away from the X factor and has truly became an artist in her own right and she completely owned the stage. With her dancing and vocal abilities you almost wonder could she become a British Beyonce? Only time will tell us that. After 45 minutes of outstanding vocal performances and vigorous dancing there was a surprise in store for the lady herself as she was greeted with a birthday cake and a roaring rendition of happy birthday from the captivated audience. She rounded off the set with a huge rendition of ‘Bad Boys’ and sent the crowd on their way to enjoy their night. She was truly amazing and it was a brilliant way to round off the night, but pride was nearly over so Monday had a lot to live up to.

Monday

So the last day of pride was upon me, and I must say it was a little bit sad after all the fun I’d had over the weekend, so I was determined to have a good time. Sadly the weather was still gloomy but it hadn’t dampened any one’s spirits over the last three days so I was pretty sure today wouldn’t be any different.

As I arrived at the main stage I discovered that they were in fact running late, which was a pleasant surprise as I could now see more than I had intended on. Due to this slight delay in time I was able to witness the musical stylings of Hazell Dean, complete with a small child, and then Alexis Houston who both got the crowds dancing and prepared for the amazing Toyah.

Toyah hit the stage in an outrages outfit with a huge headpiece, not quite as outrageous as Lady Gaga but it was good enough for me, she danced and jumped around the stage brimming with energy and it was brilliant to see a 1970s/80s rock icon doing her thing. She performed hits such as ‘It’s a Mystery’ and the crowd well and truly loved her as they danced around and her new single, a dance style song that went down a storm with the crowd. Alas Toyah was over after around half an hour, but every minute was brilliant.

Then the stage moved on to the more comedic musical styling of 4 Poofs and a piano, who were absolutely brilliant, and the crowd well and truly loved them as they sang comedy musical songs such as ‘Football’s Coming Out’ and a little song aimed at all the men called ‘Do You Take it up The Ass.’ One particular stand out moment from their set had to be a rendition of Adele’s ‘Someone Like You’ with slightly altered lyrics dedicated to Jonathan Ross.

As their set came to an end I was brimming with excitement for the next act, the original line up of Bucks Fizz. They hit the stage to loud cheers from the crowd as they belted out hits from the 80s including ‘The Land of Make Believe’ and the crowd absolutely loved them as audience members young and old sang along to the nostalgic cheese on offer. The weather held off as the classic group brought the sun with them, and then as their set came to a close after a mega mix of some 80s classic such as The Eurythmics ‘Sweet Dreams’, the band closed with their most memorable song ‘Making Your Mind Up’, complete with tear away skirts! Yes the band still has it thirty years after their most famous performance of the song at the Eurovision song contest.

As they exited the stage I too soon exited the event that was pride, it really does cost a lot you know! But I must say the weekend was brimming with excitement, joy, and the word fabulous, but most importantly pride! Not even the weather could dampen the spirits of the thousands of people who had gathered for the weekend festivities of ‘Gay Christmas.’

Seriously ...

I just have to say, what is wrong with children/teenagers???

Now I know I'm only 21 but I can honestly say I was no where near as bad as some kids around at this very moment in time.

Only last week we saw images of numerous children under the age of 16 jumping on board the rioting band wagon in the hope of stealing some new trainers or to simply just smash something up ... seriously what the hell is that all about?

Numerous people said during the riots said they were doing it because there was nothing for them, so because there is 'nothing for them' they decided to smash up what ever was left, smart move! But after seeing a lot of these young criminals in the newspapers quite a few did have something going for them, such as the girl who was an ambassador for the Olympics ... Seriously how can she say that there's nothing go for her?

Only yesterday I was walking into town when something smashed into the side of my leg, which I assume was a tomato after there were seeds all over my leg. The culprits were a group of about 10-15 kids aged between about 12 and 15, who soon ran away after throwing the ever dangerous tomato. 

Now as you can assume I was fuming and rightly so, but what if it hadn't been a fruit? What if had been a brick?

If it had been a brick and it had caught me in the head then I think I can safely say I wouldn't be writing this right now. No doubt these were probably the sort of 15-year-olds who joined the rioting Facebook groups that were promptly shut down last week.

I seriously do not know what is wrong with young people today, and they are giving the remainder of young people a bad reputation. Now I was no saint when I was 15 but I didn't go around throwing things at people and smashing things up! I wouldn't have dared because my mother would have killed me to be quite honest and i think that's is the problem with these idiotic children now, their parents.

They seriously need to learn how to discipline their kids because one day it will be a brick and someone will end up dead ... and whose fault will that be?

Opinion: Gay TV Takeover?

Originally posted on ww.lgf.org.uk

Last week Brian Sewell hit the headlines after his attack on Coronation Street for its apparent unrealistic portrayal of homosexual characters within the soap, believing that there were too many. 

In his article Sewell wrote, “Is it true that the lives of heterosexual Mancunians are haplessly intertwined with transvestites, transsexuals, teenage lesbians and a horde of homosexuals across the age range? Is Manchester now the Sodom of the North?”

Well the answer to this is yes, and it’s not just up North where the lives of people from the LGB&T community have mixed with people of the heterosexual community, it’s happening all over Britain, as believe it or not in the 21st century people are out and proud and it is ok to be gay.

Sewell Mentioned in his column that there were far too many people from the LGB&T community in Coronation Street considering that only 6 percent of the population are gay.

How does he know this? How does anybody know this? That 6 percent is an estimation of how many gay people there are in the UK, as there is no official way of finding out the sexual orientation of many people, and with news items like this still being written in 2011 we may never know.

Think about it, in today’s day and age how much do we really know about the people living on our streets? 

If you’re like me, and most people in the UK today, then the answer is not a lot, so no one knows how many homosexuals are in fact living in one area, the only reason we know this on soaps is because we are given a window into the characters lives.

What is even more infuriating is the notion that having a few gay characters living in Coronation Street is deemed far-fetched or unbelievable, yet the thought of having serial killers pop up every few years is deemed perfectly fine. Tell me how many serial killers have lived on your street over the last 10 years? I can assure you it wont be as many as Coronation Street or any other soap has had. Well lets hope not anyway.

Eastenders has also come under criticism recently and wasn’t spared when it came to this article last week. The show caused outrage for showing two men in bed together, who were apparently naked (the horror), with people saying it should be shown after the watershed, but why? This is just a normal portrayal of a gay relationship. I can assure you I have seen heterosexual couples in bed together that are seemingly naked on several occasions over the years and not once have I heard uproar over that.

Apparently these people who are complaining are just thinking of the children, but how can they be thinking about the children when they want a true portrayal of a gay relationship banned until after the watershed? Surely they are just enforcing homophobic prejudices upon their children and telling them that if they are gay and lie in bed naked together with someone of the same sex then it’s a sin, where as being naked in bed with someone of the opposite sex is fine.

The recent teenage lesbian storyline shown on Coronation Street has had a significant impact on young people across the UK who are struggling with coming to terms with their sexuality, and it has shown them that being gay is nothing to be ashamed of, and we haven’t seen a sudden rise in teenage lesbians because of it have we? No, so what’s the problem?

According to Sewell there’s a new book called Primetime Propaganda by Benjamin Shapio, which argues that an exclusively liberal TV establishment shapes taste, style, politics and family life and attitudes, and complains that gay writers, directors and actors admit to promoting their own gay rights agendas.

Fair enough, maybe the writers and directors are using elements of Coronation Street to show gay characters and by doing this they are helping to portray members of the LGB&T community in a positive light, but to suggest propaganda just makes it sound as though some people haven’t progressed very much in the last 50 years.

On a final note, surely by attacking the soap and saying there are too many gay characters and suggesting that certain scenes should be shown after the watershed, isn’t the whole article that started this debate working as a piece of homophobic propaganda?